Home  
Shop Subscribe Contact us About us
---- News Categories -----        

LATEST NEWS
Chemicals
Children's health
Climate change
Diet
Energy sources

Fertility
Food Industry
GM crops
Illnesses
Lifestyle

Transport
Vaccination
Women's health
Workplace health
TOP TWENTY
Subscribe/Renew

CHILDREN'S HEALTH

Garden pesticides quadruple
children’s cancer risk

Two minute mobile phone
calls affect children’s brains
for 50 minutes

Let them sweat
- fever protects against
asthma and eczema

Ultrasound damages babies

Calpol - you won’t believe
what’s in it

Puberty at ten?
- it could be the TV

Don't microwave baby's
breast milk!

Asthma linked to pesticides

Chemicals leak into
baby food

Amalgam fillings increase
mercury body burden

Mercury in vaccinations
increases risk of autism

Disposable nappy chemicals
hazardous to babies


Effects of chemical pollution
on child development


Early schooling
damages children

Rickets returning in children

Diet cures disruptive behaviour

Proof watching TV increases
food disorders in teenagers

 
Amalgam fillings increase body's mercury burden

Children living near Bitterfeld and Hettstedt in East Germany - centres of coal mining, chemical production and metal smelting - were found to have various high levels of mercury in their blood and urine. Tests were unable to correlate the different levels with levels of pollution. The only correlation the researchers could find was with the number of amalgam fillings the children had. To double check whether environmental pollution was the cause the researchers measured the blood and urine levels of children without any fillings in differently polluted areas but there were no significant differences.

Mercury from amalgam fillings is released by direct vaporisation from metallic mercury contained in the amalgam. The amount of gas is increased by grinding the teeth or chewing. Correlations between the number of amalgam fillings and mercury levels in blood and urine has now been reported in several studies.

(2081) Trepka, MJ et al. Archives of Environmental Health 1997;52(2),134-38