Home  
Shop Subscribe Contact us About us
---- News Categories -----        

LATEST NEWS
Chemicals
Children's health
Climate change
Diet
Energy sources

Fertility
Food Industry
GM crops
Illnesses
Lifestyle

Transport
Vaccination
Women's health
Workplace health
TOP TWENTY
Subscribe/Renew

CLIMATE CHANGE

Does water vapour not
carbon dioxide rule
global warming?

Is human activity-generated
carbon dioxide the main
cause of global warming?

Aircraft vapour trails may
heat planet


US and UK climate control or
weapons of mass illness?

Reforestation not the answer
to global warming

Megacities create own
heatwaves and summer
storms

Coal-fired "factories of death"

Global dimming

Air pollution changes weather

Canadian climate ahead
for UK


Is global warming a natural
solar event?


Warmer seas threaten
world coral

Killing the African dream

Dams as dirty as coal-fired
power stations

Dire predictions on
global warming


Downside of global
warming reductions


As nitrogen levels in the soil
go down global warming
goes up


Who owes who? - climate
change and 'third world debt'

 
Downside of actions to reduce global warming

University of East Anglia's Dr Anthony Ridgewell warned that environmental measures contained in the Kyoto protocol may backfire because governments and their scientific advisors have not considered the full impact of proposed actions. He took the proposed promotion of 'no tillage' farming and new forest planting as examples.

Both reduce carbon dioxide levels, but also the amount of dust in the atmosphere. A lot of dust blown off dry earth lands on the sea, providing the iron essential to the growth of plankton, tiny marine plants which soak up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, reducing global warming.

Ed.- There is very little doubt now that a major part of global warming is caused by excessive human interference with the subtle balance of life nature maintains on the planet. It seems that every new action to reduce global warming considered by humans has unforeseen downsides. Planting new forests, for instance, was initially heralded as a powerful way to reduce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. When the young trees were growing it would be the case but, considering the full cycle of the trees, the effect on carbon dioxide levels would be neutral. Perhaps humans are simply not yet clever enough to understand the intricate, interactive and interdependent workings of nature. Perhaps they should limit their actions to simply stopping doing things and letting nature repair itself over time.

(8878) Charles Clover. Daily Telegraph