 |
DIRTY
MEDICINE
 |
Statins
may dull thinking
and memory Cancer
drug effectiveness unproven Drug
safety tests indaequate NSAID
drugs stop bone
from healing Vaccinated
mums pass on
less immunity Why
statins are a bad idea HRT-breast
cancer link real Government
corrupts science The
mercury in mum's mouth Squalene
in swine flu jab Drugs
fourth greatest killer Mercury
linked to autism Anti-inflammatory
drugs
kill 2,000 in UK MMR-autism
link grows Paracetamol
wrecks babies' health HPV-cervical
cancer link challenged Government's
cosy relationship
with HPV jab Aluminium
in new jab |
|
|
HPV
cervical cancer link not proven
A team of researchers at the Royal Free Hospital in London is
very doubtful of a link.[1] Having
monitored 200 women for six years back in 1994, they discovered
that:
- the presence of HPV-16 virus (one of the HPV
strains against which the new vaccine is supposed to protect)
had not increased a woman’s likelihood of having cervical
cancer (low grade or high grade)
- women with low grade cervical cancer had
been more likely to progress to high grade cervical cancer than
virus-free women, but
- the progression from low rate to high rate
cervical cancer had occurred at the same rate whether HPV-16
was present or not
They recommended their colleagues to stop looking for viruses
and to look instead for traces of cancer.
Read more about
the HPV vaccine
[1] Downey,GP
et al. Lancet. 1994;344(8929):1097
(13168) Nick Anderson. Green Health Watch
1.9.07
|
|
| |