The UK Food Standards Agency (FSA) claimed that their latest research
[1] proved that GM soya was harmless
to humans. The distinguished scientist Dr Arpad Puszta, who lost
his job at Aberdeen’s Rowett Institute after announcing
that he had found stunted growth, immune system damage and stomach
abnormalities in mice fed with GM potatoes, condemned the FSA’s
science:
When seven ileostomy patients* were given a single meal
containing GM soya, measurable amounts of full-length soy
transgene (GM DNA) construct were found in gut bacteria
collected from their bags. In three of the patients there
were highly significant amounts. This confirmed earlier
studies using mice [2] and
artificial guts [3] The FSA
report falsely portrayed these full-length soy transgene
constructs as small, non-functional (and therefore harmless)
fragments of GM DNA which could not have transformed the
gut bacteria to become antibiotic resistant
The FSA’s assertion that GM soya was harmless because
their scientists could not find transgenic DNA in the faeces
of normal human subjects should also be dismissed. It is
the physiological effects of the transgene(s) and their
products on the gut during their passage through the small
intestine that is important, not what is left after the
digested remnants have journeyed through the large intestine
and left the body
It was also curious that the FSA
used GM soya to establish whether the antibiotic resistance
marker gene could be passed on to human gut bacteria. GM
soya is one of the few GM crops which do not contain such
a marker gene
* People whose large intestine has been surgically removed
and replaced with an external bag joined to the lower end
of their small intestine
[1] UK Food Standards Agency website
[2] Schubbert,R et al.
Molecules, Genes and Genetics 1998;259:569-576
[3] MacKenzie,D. New Scientist 30.1.99