One of the largest studies of childhood cancer ever carried out
in Britain (22,400 children who died between 1953 and 1980) established
strong links between birthplace and death from leukaemia and other
childhood cancers. The children’s birthplace was more important
than where they grew up in setting a risk.
The highest risks were within three miles of oil refineries
(petrol fumes), car factories (principally paint spray), steel
works, cement works and crematoria and power stations. (Except
for a few exceptions, nuclear power stations did not
appear to have a significant risk.) Additional risk was also
found within 2.5 miles of motorways and railways (petrol and
diesel fumes). The scientists also considered proximity to (i)
petrol stations, (ii) bus stations, and (iii) school and hospital
chimneys a increased hazard.
The study found that the increased risk around factories was
constant over many years, giving the lie to the hypothesis that
clusters of illness could be attributed to a sudden influx into
an area of building workers carrying viruses new to the area.
The persistent excesses could only be attributed to environmental
factors.
The researchers concluded that exposure of pregnant women and
young babies directly to airborne pollutants was the most likely
mechanism by which the excess cancer clusters were caused. The
way the pollutants combined with each other to form secondary
pollutants was also significant.
(1883)
Jeremy Laurence. The Times