Opponents of nuclear power have long warned that nuclear plants
of all types are ideal targets for terrorists. It has taken the
September 11th Twin Towers catastrophe to focus media attention
and the owners’ minds on the issue. British Nuclear Fuels
(BNFL) admit that nuclear power plants have only been designed
to withstand the impact of light planes and military aircraft.
They accept that “the consequences of a plant being hit
by a commercial aircraft loaded with fuel would be unthinkable”.
When a reactor explodes the devastation is far greater than
that caused by an atomic bomb. In 1986 Chernobyl, for instance,
released 3% of its radioactive material in vast plumes which
will continue to contaminate parts of Cumbria (UK), France,
Bavaria, Greece, Italy and Corsica for many more years. What
degree of impact nuclear power plants have been designed to
withstand is, anyway, beside the point. Advanced Gas Reactors
(AGRs), for instance, dubbed ‘benign’ by the industry,
depend on externally-generated electricity to power their safety
and cooling systems. If the electricity supply was taken out
by an attack there is the potential for a massive explosion.
Nuclear engineer Richard Webb describes the effect of a near
full release into the atmosphere of the radioactive material
from one AGR:
-
The evacuation and abandonment of about 120,000 sq. kilometres
of land (an area equivalent to half the UK). The abandonment
would be temporary if the contamination were with gamma
radiation, permanent if with plutonium
-
The ruin of food-producing agriculture over 750,000 sq.
km. for about 100 years due to strontium-90 and caesium-
137 fall-out
-
The abandonment of 200,000 sq. km. due to all forms of
radiation exposure
But compared to a hit on a nuclear reprocessing plant, like
Sellafield or La Hague (on the French Channel coast), a hit
on a nuclear power plant is as nothing. If either were hit,
the caesium-137 released into the air would devastate England,
France and most of Northern Europe. A World Information Service
on Energy report indicated that if just one of La Hague’s
four storage ponds released all its caesium-137 that would be
66.7 times more than that released by Chernobyl, probably causing
1.5 million cancer deaths.
Following the Twin Towers attack, the French Government has
stationed land-to-air missiles at its La Hague nuclear
reprocessing site.
(8711)
Peter Bunyard. Ecologist