A study found that the Sellafield workers' children born in Seascale
(the village near the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant) ran
an average 15 times higher risk of developing leukaemia and non--Hodgkins
lymphoma and that the Sellafield workers' children outside Seascale
ran an average twofold higher risk. The risks rose in line with
the amount of exposure their fathers had experienced prior to
the children's conception. These findings confirmed Martin Gardner's
1989 findings.
The lead researchers, Heather Dickinson and Louise Parker from
the North of England Children's Cancer Research Unit also re-examined
the evidence for the controversial External Workers' Virus
hypothesis (see below) and considered it inadequate.
In 1989 the late Professor Martin Gardner found a direct link
between a child's risk of developing leukaemia and the amount
of radiation to which their fathers had been exposed whilst
working at Sellafield. He found up to an eightfold increased
risk.
The finding was rubbished by the nuclear industry whose scientists
dreamed up several other explanations for the child leukaemia
clusters identified within a few miles of the plant. One of
these was that workers moving into the area to build and work
at Sellafield had brought with them viruses to which the local
inhabitants had little resistance (leukaemia can be caused by
viruses). What the industry scientists did not explain was why
other major building projects involving external workers around
the world had not shown similar leukaemia clusters.
Work by the Institute of Evolution and the Kaput Holim National
Cancer Control Centre in Israel and the Research Centre
for Radiation Medicine in the Ukraine gives strong support
to Martin Gardner's theory. They found a sevenfold increase
in DNA mutation in children born to fathers who had worked
as 'liquidators' (clearer uppers) after the Chernobyl accident.
The mutation increases the risk of cancer as well as of
genetic instability in the children's own descendants, and
occurs even at the lowest levels of exposure.