 |
VITAMIN
D3
 |
Vitamin D could
prevent 600,000
deaths a year!
Low
vitamin D levels kill 45,000 Americans every year
Vitamin
D - how much do I need?
Vitamin
D - how
much sunlight?
Low
vitamin D heart disease patients
twice as likely to die
Vitamin
D protected
against
heart disease
Vitamin
D reduced blood clotting
Test
your D3 level!
Vitamin
D protected
against
many cancers
Vitamin
D, cancers and
latitude
Vitamin
D - no practical
food sources
Vitamin
D - the
need to supplement
Canadian
Cancer Society
plugs vitamin
D
Most
new UK mums
deficient in vitamin
D
"Over
half of all babies
born vitamin D-deficient"
Vitamin
D reduced
babies' risk
of diabetes type 1
Rickets
threatens UK kids
Could
autism be caused by
Vitamin
D-deficiency?
Breasts
produce vitamin
D to
fight off breast cancer
Vitamin
D
cut risk of developing
breast cancer by a third
Vitamin
D protected
against
lung cancer
How
vitamin
D protects
against
colon cancer
Vitamin
D protected
against
ovarian cancer
D3
lengthened lives of
prostate patients
D3
and calcium reduced
risk of falls
D3
and calcium reduced
risk of fractures
D3
protected against
hip fracture
D3
helped body
absorb calcium
D3
protected against
rheumatoid arthritis
Back
and muscle pain
vitamin D3 deficiency?
D3
"may halve risk of
developing MS"
Vitamin
D Parkinson’s
patient's
"remarkable improvement"
Vitamin
D kept
brains sharper
Vitamin
D protected
against
gum disease
Vitamin
D protected
against flu
Vitamin
D could prevent
and
treat bird flu
Vitamin
D
and 'synthetic sunshine!'
Sunbed
boosted Vitamin
Ditamin D levels
Vitamin
D - the technical
bit
|
|
|
Vitamin
D3 helps body absorb calcium
Patients with vitamin D3 (25(OH)D) blood levels of 86 nmol/L
(the top end of what is currently considered a ‘healthy
level’) absorbed 65% more calcium from their food and drink
than subjects with D3 levels of 50 nmol/L (the bottom end of ‘healthy’).
The scientists suggested that the bottom end of ‘healthy’
was currently set too low.
View Vitamin
Research Products' vitamin D3 1,000iu supplement
Ed.- (i) Although 50 nmol/L is generally the accepted bottom
end of the normal range, [1] more
recent research suggests that parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels
[2,3] and calcium absorption
[4] are not optimised until serum D3 levels reach approximately
80 nmol/L, just below the average serum levels achieved in the
group who received D3 supplementation at the beginning of the
above study. Thus, at least one vitamin D expert has argued that
serum D3 values less than 80 nmol/L should be considered deficient,
[5] while another suggests that a
healthy serum 25(OH)D value should be considered to be between
75 nmol/L and 125 nmol/L. [6] Studies
investigating the level of vitamin D intake which would be required
by adults living in temperate latitudes to achieve such a range
of levels suggest a daily vitamin D3 supplement of between 800
and 1,000 IU. [7,8]
Current US ‘adequate D3 intakes’ are: anyone under
the age of 51, including pregnant and breastfeeding women - 200IU;
anyone aged 51 to 70 - 400IU; anyone over the age of 70 - 600IU.
So, raising blood vitamin D levels by either exposing skin or
eyes to sunlight or consuming more vitamin D3 in food supplements
might reduce, even eliminate, the need for calcium supplementation.
(ii) Current US recommended upper intakes: infants 0-12 months
- 1,000 IU, children 1-18 years and adults 19 years and older
- 2000 IU.
View Vitamin
Research Products' vitamin D3 1,000iu supplement
[1] Malabanan,A et al. Lancet 1998;351(9105):805-06
[2] Chapuy,MC et al. Osteoporosis International 1997;7(5):439-43
[3] Thomas,MK, et al. New England Journal of Medicine 1998;338(12):777-83
[4] Heaney,RP et al. Journal of the American College of Nutrition
2003;22(2):142-46
[5] Heaney,RP. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 2003;78(5):912-19
[6] Holick,MF. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2003;78(12):1457-59
[7] Vieth R. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999;69(5):842-56
[8] Tangpricha,V et al. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
2003;77(6):1478-83
(12282) Heaney,RP et al. Journal of the
American College of Nutrition 2003 ;22(2):142-46
|
|
| |