Home  
Shop Subscribe Contact us About us
---- News Categories -----        

LATEST NEWS
Chemicals
Children's health
Climate change
Diet
Energy sources

Fertility
Food Industry
GM crops
Illnesses
Lifestyle

Transport
Vaccination
Women's health
Workplace health
TOP TWENTY
Subscribe/Renew

WOMEN'S HEALTH
breast cancer

Killer bras?

Carrots and breast cancer

Having first baby before 22
best protection


Return to WOMEN'S HEALTH
subject selector

Go to MEN'S HEALTH
subject selector


Coffee may boost
oestrogen levels


Breast cancer prevention
at 8p a day

Surgery may spread
cancer


Dairy-free diet for
breast cancer


Breast cancer and sunlight

Genetic susceptibility
exaggerated


Breast cancer halted
HRT study


Nuclear stitch up
in breast cancer clusters


Mass screening bad
for over 50s


Night shifts and breast cancer

Over 50s obesity doubled
breast cancer risk


Obesity in pregnancy
cancer risk


Overeating, exercise
and breast cancer


Tamoxifen not to be used
as a preventative


Tamoxifen and
endometrial cancer


Tamoxifen may lead to
new breast tumours


Prolonged use of the Pill can
double risk of cancer

 
Genetic susceptibility exaggerated
Colin Begg of New York’s Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center argues that genetic susceptibility is nowhere near as clear cut as many geneticists would like to believe and that there are many environmental and lifestyle factors which reinforce or protect against it.

Colin reviewed many studies of breast cancer risk in women with two common breast cell mutations, BRCA1 and BRCA2. He established that the studies which had taken such subjects from families with histories of breast cancer calculated far higher levels of risk (sometimes as high as 85% - almost certainty!) than the studies which had included women whatever their family history. These produced a much lower and consistent risk, thus probably more correct.

(9322) Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002;94:1221-26