Home  
Shop Subscribe Contact us About us
---- News Categories -----        

LATEST NEWS
Chemicals
Children's health
Climate change
Diet
Energy sources

Fertility
Food Industry
GM crops
Illnesses
Lifestyle

Transport
Vaccination
Women's health
Workplace health
TOP TWENTY
Subscribe/Renew

WORKPLACE HEALTH
Ultraviolet zaps 99% of
'sick building bugs'


Toxic cleaning products
threaten cleaners

Sun screens worsen
pesticides damage

35,000 workplace deaths
in 30 years

Little justice for Bhopal workers

Benzene exposure and
low birthweights


Dead boring work


Hair dressers have
smaller babies


Night shift linked with
heart disease


Plants hoover up stress
and pollution


Repetitive strain injury
- statistics


High cancer rates in
semiconductor workers


Organic solvents increase
risk of MS


Chemical safety thresholds
lower in UK


Dirty work - 34% of cancers
are work-related

 
Sick building syndrome
Many occurrences of ‘sick building syndrome’ have been firmly attributed to (e.g.) poor ventilation, airborne bacteria continuously recycled in air conditioning or tobacco smoke, but many more have remained a complete mystery. Peter Wolkoff of the Copenhagen Institute (Denmark) found another potential culprit: chemicals so short-lived that they had escaped the detection systems scientists had set up.

Peter noted that volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which may cause no distress on their own at low levels could give rise to eye and airway irritation when combining for a short period with ozone. These common VOCs come from (e.g.) a popular lemon scent, chemicals in the carpets and linoleum, tobacco smoke, wood and pine scent. Ozone can come from (e.g.) photocopiers and outside air.

When mice breathed typical levels of ozone or alpha-pinene (a common VOC) separately there was a minimal effect. When the mice breathed a mixture of ozone and alpha-pinene after it had been left for a while, there was, again, a minimal effect. But, when the mice breathed a fresh mixture, after 30 minutes their breathing rate decreased an average 30%, indicating airway irritation.

(3655) Lila Guterman. New Scientist